Technology assessment of the topic 'renewable resources'

  • Project team:

    Wintzer, Detlev (Project leader), Beate Fürniß, Sigrid Klein-Vielhauer, Ludwig Leible, Eberhard Nieke, Christine Rösch, Heinrich Tangen

  • Funding:

    German Ministry of Research and Technology (BMFT)

  • Start date:

    1988

  • End date:

    1993

  • Project partners:

    The following external experts participated in the project via subcontracts:
    Prof. Dr. W. Großkopf / Prof. Dr. K.-H. Kappelmann, University of Hohenheim;
    Prof. Dr. W. Haber, Lehrstuhl für Landschaftsökologie, TU Munich, Freising;
    Prof. Dr. W. Henrichsmeyer, University of Bonn;
    Prof. Dr. D. Schliephake, Forschungs- und Industrie-Beratungsgesellschaft, Bad Honnef;
    Dr. A. Strehler, Bayer. Landesanstalt für Landtechnik (regional office for agricultural engineering, TU Munich, Freising;
    Prof. Dr. C. Thoroe, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg;
    Frau Prof. Dr. A. Vömel, University of Gießen;
    Dr. H. Woelk, Hamburg;
    Prof. Dr. J. Wurster, STW Steinbeis-Stiftung für Wirtschaftsförderung, Reutlingen;
    Prof. Dr. J. Zeddies / Dr. R. Doluschitz, University of Hohenheim

  • Research group:

    Sustainability and environment; Energy - resources, technologies, systems

Project description

In the technology assessment study conducted at the request of the German Ministry of Research and Technology, different groups of energy carriers, chemical raw materials, and other types of plant-derived industrial material were examined from technical, economic, ecological, and social points of view for any detectible advantages and disadvantages or chances and risks. The starting point for this was the reference year 1990. By developing and using various scenarios, the medium-term perspectives were estimated for the year 2005. The work was completed with the publication of the results in book form in 1993. Furthermore, the detailed background information for the entire study, which was compiled by external experts or groups of experts, was documented in 36 volumes of material.

In the field of renewable resources for energy, analyses and calculations were carried out for some 50 product lines in order to be able to make statements on the following issues:

  • The current (reference year 1990) economic situation from a macroeconomic perspective
  • The economic perspectives for the medium-term future (2005) taking into consideration any technological and economic progress
  • Threshold prices (basis: the price of heating oil for small-scale consumers)
  • CO2 mitigation costs
  • Other environmental factors (e.g., soil erosion, nitrogen emissions)
  • Impact on employment/income and the acceptance by farmers

Decisive for the economic evaluation is the fact that renewable resources for energy will not become competitive until the fossil energy carriers that are being replaced reach the energy price level referred to as the threshold price. The smaller the respective distance to the threshold price, the smaller are the CO2 mitigation costs. Relatively economically efficient options for reducing CO2 are available if the threshold price is clearly under 100 DM/MWh.

The results of the technical, economic, and environmentally relevant analyses led to the following significant conclusions:

  • The future prospects for (domestic) renewable energy carriers from a macroeconomic perspective are greater for product lines that use solid renewable energy carriers to access the heating market than for ethanol, methanol, and rapeseed oil. As a rule, in many sectors of the heating and combined heat and power market these liquid energy carriers produce a lower yield per hectare (ha), a less favorable net energy balance, a lower net reduction in CO2 per hectare, higher CO2 mitigation costs, and higher feasible energy prices (threshold prices) for fossil energy carriers than is the case for solid renewable energy carriers. An advantage of the liquid energy carriers (especially of rapeseed oil) is the fact that it can be introduced technologically relatively rapidly into the fuel and heating markets, assuming the relevant subsidies are available.
  • There are, in contrast, two disadvantages hemming the solid renewable energy carriers. First, more time is needed for research, development, and demonstrations. Numerous questions in the field of crop farming (especially miscanthus), harvesting, drying, compaction, logistics, and the technologies utilizing these energy carriers need to be clarified further. Second, the potential for the heating and combined heat and power market to absorb it is growing slowly. The pace of this growth is also determined by the regeneration times of steam generators and combined heat and power plants and by the extension of district heating.

A further focus of the study was estimating the market potential for the different groups of product lines of renewable energy carriers and analyzing the impact on employment and income. With a view to the market potential, the study reaches the following assessment. The medium-term market potential of renewable resources for energy depends decisively on whether the advantage of achieving a reduction in CO2 will produce an economic reward and when it will be possible to access visible technical opportunities for utilizing solid fuels in plants for the cogeneration of heat and power and for conducting successful demonstrations. According to the study's estimates, some 15 to 35 million tons of solid fuel from plants could ideally be used by the energy market by 2005. The vast majority of it could consist of straw and other plant residual materials (especially forest residues). The amount of land additionally necessary for growing energy plants until 2005 would be minimal (presumably not more than some 3% of the agricultural land). It is only in the longer term (in 20-40 years) that the availability of cropland would replace the pace of marketability as the decisive factor restricting expansion.

The market potential in the chemical-technical area will be primarily determined in the medium term by plant-based oil and starch. The raw material segments of sugar, plant fiber, and medicinal and spice plants will occupy approximately 30,000 ha more by the end of the period of time under consideration in 2005 than at present. The medium-term market potential of sugar and starch will more probably be in the technical field than in that of chemical raw materials. Overall in Germany, some 0.2 to 0.6 million ha more than currently could be taken by renewable resources for the chemical-technical field by 2005 at customary production intensity. This amounts to 1.1% to 3.3% of the agricultural land. Reforestation could lead to an additional 0.8% to 1.6% of agricultural land being used for wood, the oldest renewable resource.

Proceeding from the values given above for the market potential of several types of renewable resources, we estimated an additional need for workers at between 20,000 and 60,000 full-time staff. Just as was true of its impact on employment, the significance of the impact of renewable resources on income should not be overestimated for rural areas.

Selected publication

Titelbild

Wintzer, D.; Fürniß, B.; Klein-Vielhauer, S.; Leible, L.; Nieke, E.; Rösch, Ch.; Tangen, H.
Technikfolgenabschätzung zum Thema Nachwachsende Rohstoffe. Reihe A: Angewandte Wissenschaft; Sonderheft. Münster-Hiltrup: Landwirtschaftsverlag 1993
(Schriftenr. d. Bundesmin. f. Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten)
Titelbild/jpg Volltext/pdf

Publications


1996
Book Chapters
Leible, L.
Durchführungs- und Anwendungsprobleme von Technikfolgenabschätzungen: Beispiele aus der TA-Studie "Nachwachsende Rohstoffe".
1996. Praxisfelder der Technikfolgenforschung: Konzepte, Methoden, Optionen. Hrsg.: G. Bechmann, Bechmann, G. [Hrsg.] Praxisfelder der Technikfolgenforschung : Konzepte, Methoden, Optionen Frankfurt/Main [u.a.] : Campus Verl., 1996 (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS) ; Bd.3), 41–77, Campus-Verlag 
Journal Articles
Leible, L.
Technology assessment on renewable raw materials: potentials and risks of the use of starches.
1996. Starch/Stärke, 46th Starch Convention, Detmold, April 26-28, 1995, 48 (4), 121–30 
Conference Papers
Leible, L.; Wintzer, D.
Comparisons between fluid and solid biofuels: results of a technology assessment study.
1996. Biomass for energy and the environment. Hrsg.: Proceedings of the 9th European Bioenergy Conference, 1875–1880, Pergamon 
Presentations
Leible, L.
Technology assessment on renewable raw materials: potentials and risks of the use of starches.
1996. 46th Starch Convention, Detmold, April 26-28, 1995 Starch/Stärke, 48(1996) Nr. 4 
Leible, L.; Nieke, E.
Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Ein umweltverträglicher Weg zur Bereitstellung von Rohstoffen und Energie?.
1996. Tag der offenen Tür des Forschungszentrums Karlsruhe (1996), Karlsruhe, Germany, July 6, 1996 
1995
Book Chapters
Leible, L.
Umwelteffekte des Anbaus und der Verwertung von nachwachsenden Rohstoffen: Flächenbedarf, Energie- und CO2-Bilanz, Beschäftigungseffekte.
1995. Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Strohfeuer oder Ausweg? Beiträge zum Hearing am 8. und 9. Juni 1995 in Bonn. Hrsg.: Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 16–28 
Leible, L.; Wintzer, D.
Technikfolgenabschätzung zum Thema ’Nachwachsende Rohstoffe’.
1995. Eberlein, D. [Hrsg.] Systemanalyse und Technikfolgenabschätzung : Die Praxis in den deutschen Großforschungseinrichtungen Frankfurt [u.a.] : Campus, 1995 (Studien zur Geschichte der deutschen Großforschungseinrichtungen ; 9), 51–65 
Journal Articles
Leible, L.
Hoffnungsträger Pflanze - vom Lebensmittel zum Brennstoff.
1995. Kirche im ländlichen Raum, 46 (1), 10–15 
Conference Papers
Leible, L.
Technikfolgenabschätzung Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Zielsetzung, Vorgehensweise, Bewertung.
1995. 3.Symp.Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Perspektiven für die Chemie, Monheim, 4.-5.Mai 1994 Tagungsbd. Muenster-Hiltrup : Landwirtschaftsverl., 1994 (Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums fuer Ernaehrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten : Reihe A: Angewandte Wissenschaft ; Sonderh.), 40–55 
Presentations
Leible, L.
Technikfolgenabschätzung zu Nachwachsenden Rohstoffen (NR): Chancen und Risiken der Stärkeverwendung.
1995. 46. Stärke-Tagung / Starch Convention (1995), Detmold, Germany, April 28, 1995 
Leible, L.
Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (NR): Chancen und Risiken für die Landwirtschaft.
1995. Vortragsveranstaltung, Stiftung Ökofonds/Letzebuerger Jongbaueren a Jongwenzer (1995), Mersch, Luxembourg, March 10, 1995 
Leible, L.
Auswirkungen des Anbaus und der Verwendung Nachwachsender Rohstoffe : Flächenbedarf, Energie- und CO2-Bilanz, Beschäftigungseffekte.
1995, December 14. Bündnis90/Die Grünen (Bundestagsfraktion, Landtagsfraktion Sachsen-Anhalt), Fachtagung: "Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Zukunftsmärkte in Sachsen-Anhalt?" (1995), Magdeburg, Germany, December 14, 1995 
Leible, L.
Technikfolgenabschätzung Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Zielsetzung, Vorgehensweise, Bewertung.
1995. 3.Symp.Nachwachsende Rohstoffe - Perspektiven für die Chemie, Monheim, 4.-5.Mai 1994 Tagungsbd. Muenster-Hiltrup : Landwirtschaftsverl., 1994 (Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums fuer Ernaehrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten : Reihe A: Angewandte Wissenschaft ; Sonderh.) 
1993
Book Chapters
Leible, L.; Wintzer, D.
Energiebilanzen bei nachwachsenden Energieträgern: Bedeutung und Beispiele.
1993. Energie aus Biomasse: eine Chance für die Landwirtschaft ? Hrsg.: H. Flaig, H. Mohr, 67–83, Springer Verlag 
Presentations
Leible, L.
Technikfolgenabschätzung (TA) zu Nachwachsenden Rohstoffen (NR): ein Beispiel für die Durchführung von TA-Untersuchungen.
1993. Ringvorlesung der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (1993), Merseburg, Germany, May 13, 1993 
Leible, L.
Chancen für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (NR) - Raps im Vergleich zu anderen NR: technische, ökonomische und umweltrelevante Kennwerte und Bewertung.
1993. Agrarforum der Evangelischen Jugend auf dem Lande (EJL 1993), Altenkirchen, Germany, March 6, 1993 
1992
Journal Articles
Wintzer, D.; Fürniß, B.; Klein-Vielhauer, S.; Leible, L.; Nieke, E.; Rösch, C.; Tangen, H.
Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse der TA-Studie “Nachwachsende Rohstoffe”.
1992. KfK-Nachrichten, 24 (4), 245–253 
Presentations
Leible, L.
Chancen und Risiken für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (NR) - Ergebnisse einer Technikfolgenabschätzung.
1992, December 15. Seminar Pflanzenbau II, Universität Hohenheim (1992), Stuttgart, Germany, December 15, 1992 
1991
Journal Articles
Wintzer, D.; Fürniß, B.; Klein-Vielhauer, S.; Leible, L.; Nieke, E.; Petermann, T.; Rösch, C.; Tangen, H.
Technikfolgenabschätzung zum Thema ’Nachwachsende Rohstoffe’. Zwischenbericht: Energetische Nutzung nachwachsender Energieträger.
1991. Agra-Europe, 48, 1–52 
Presentations
Leible, L.
Ziele und Möglichkeiten der Technikfolgenabschätzung (TA) - Veranschaulicht am Beispiel Nachwachsende Rohstoffe.
1991. Verband Deutscher Akademiker für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Landespflege, Landesverband Baden-Württemberg (1991), Stuttgart, Germany, June 5, 1991 

Contact

Dr. Ludwig Leible
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)
P.O. Box 3640
76021 Karlsruhe
Germany